ZENTARA
The Zentara war room — where advisory positions get argued
Cybersecurity Consulting · Advisory & Architecture

Consulting from operators, not observers.

The advisory arm of a firm that runs SOCs, breaks systems, and ships security products.

Most consulting ends in a deck. Ours ends in a decision — argued from evidence our own operations generate, priced as options, and sequenced so your team can deliver it.

9

Fixed-scope engagements, priced before start

4

Operating benches behind the advice — SOC · offensive · forensics · Labs

90 days

Adoption check-in after every engagement, included

Certified & audited operations

BSSN — Badan Siber dan Sandi NegaraISO/IEC 27001 CertifiedISO/IEC 42001:2023 CertifiedAICPA SOC 2 Type 2
Verify at our trust centre

The gap

The advice industry has an evidence problem.

Security decisions get made with vendor pitches on one side and audit findings on the other. What's missing is an architect who has run the operations.

The parachute team

Seniors sell the engagement. Juniors deliver it — learning your environment on your invoice.

The deck that dies

Forty findings, no owners, no sequence, no prices. Filed after the readout, cited at the next audit.

The vendor echo

Advice that lands suspiciously close to whoever pays the referral fee. The tooling recommendation was written before the assessment.

A Zentara consultant working an architecture session at HQ

Working session · Zentara HQ

Advisory here is worked, not presented. Positions are argued against the live estate — and against the people who run our SOC and offensive benches.

The difference

Advice tested on our own operating floor

Four benches stand behind every recommendation. Each one is a business Zentara runs — not a slide it presents.

We run the watch

Zentara operates 24/7 SOCs for national banks and carriers. Advice on detection architecture comes from people who hold the pager — not people who read about it.

Managed SOC · ZX

We attack systems

A 137-type offensive catalog delivered by OSCP and GPEN certified testers. Architecture reviews are informed by how systems actually fall, not how diagrams say they should hold.

VAPT · Red Team

We work the cases

Incident response and court-grade forensics under ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory discipline. Resilience advice is shaped by what we find in the wreckage — repeatedly.

IR & Digital Forensics

We ship products

ZX, AVAS, and Agent ODYSSEY are built in-house under ISO 42001. We have made the build-versus-buy calls with our own budget — and lived with them.

Zentara Labs

Team on your engagementTypical: Juniors learning on your invoiceZentara: Senior practitioners only — people who rotate through live operations
Evidence baseTypical: Interviews and questionnairesZentara: Interviews plus instruments — AVAS baseline, SOC telemetry, offensive findings, config review
The deliverableTypical: A findings deckZentara: A decision memo — options priced, one recommended in writing, sequenced for delivery
After the readoutTypical: The team disappearsZentara: A 90-day adoption check-in, included in every engagement
CommercialsTypical: Billable hours, open-endedZentara: Fixed scope, fixed fee, agreed before start

Practice areas

Six practices. One bench.

Every practice is anchored to an operating capability inside Zentara — so the advice is never further than one desk from the people doing the work.

Security Strategy & Program Design

Operating models, organization and hiring plans, budget defense, and the board narrative that funds it all.

Grounded in vCISO practice

Security Architecture & Engineering

Reference architectures, segmentation and zero-trust design, identity architecture, and detection-coverage engineering.

Grounded in SOC + offensive operations

Cloud & Infrastructure Security

Landing zones, migration guardrails, hybrid and multi-cloud hardening — with data-sovereignty constraints designed in, not bolted on.

Grounded in managed cloud delivery

Regulatory & Compliance Advisory

OJK POJK, BSSN, UU PDP, MAS TRM, ISO 27001, SOC 2 — clause-level gap work with a closure plan someone can actually execute.

Grounded in regulator correspondence

Data & AI Security Governance

AI risk policy, ISO 42001 alignment, and security for model and data pipelines — advised by a firm certified for its own AI engineering.

Grounded in Zentara Labs

Resilience & Incident Readiness

IR plan engineering, executive tabletops, and post-incident rebuild architecture drawn from cases we have worked end to end.

Grounded in IR & forensics casework

The engagements

Consulting, productized.

Nine engagements. Each has a fixed scope, a fixed fee, a named deliverable — and a question it exists to answer. If your question isn't here, we scope it the same way.

Security Architecture Review

3–4 weeks

Would our architecture hold?

Current-state map, gap analysis against a reference architecture, sequenced remediation design.

Scope this engagement

Cloud Security Assessment

3 weeks

Is our cloud estate configured the way we think it is?

Configuration review across the estate, landing-zone redesign, and a guardrail set your team can enforce.

Scope this engagement

Regulatory Gap Assessment

3–4 weeks

Where do we actually stand against OJK, UU PDP, or MAS TRM?

Clause-level gap register per framework with a prioritized, costed closure plan.

Scope this engagement

Security Tooling Rationalization

2–3 weeks

What are we paying for that isn't protecting us?

Stack inventory, overlap and shelfware analysis, consolidation plan with a savings estimate.

Scope this engagement

M&A Cyber Due Diligence

1–2 weeks per target

What risk are we buying?

Target posture assessment, red-flag register, and a first-100-days integration security plan.

Scope this engagement

Zero Trust Roadmap

4 weeks

How do we move past the perimeter without breaking operations?

Segmentation model, identity architecture, and a phased migration plan with rollback points.

Scope this engagement

Incident Readiness Review

2–3 weeks

If it happened tonight, would the plan work?

IR plan engineering, an executive tabletop run by responders, and the gap fixes in writing.

Scope this engagement

Post-Incident Rebuild

Scoped per case

How do we make sure this never repeats?

Root-cause-driven architecture redesign, hardening sequence, and a board-ready report.

Scope this engagement

Security Program Design

4–6 weeks

What should our security function look like at our size?

Operating model, organization and hiring plan, budget model, and a 12-month delivery plan.

Scope this engagement

Not sure where to start?

Bring us the question. Framing it costs nothing.

A 45-minute working session with a senior practitioner — we name the decision, the evidence it needs, and the engagement that fits. If none does, we say so.

How we work

Frame. Evidence. Decide. Land.

The same four moves on every engagement — built so the work survives contact with your organization.

01

Frame

Every engagement opens by naming the decision it must enable, who owns that decision, and what evidence would change it. No decision, no engagement.

02

Evidence

Instruments alongside interviews — an AVAS baseline, SOC telemetry where present, offensive findings, and configuration review. Every claim in the memo traces to something observed.

03

Decide

Options with trade-offs priced — including the option to do nothing. We recommend one, in writing, and argue it in the room.

04

Land

Findings land with named owners and a sequence, not a wishlist. Ninety days later we come back and score adoption — that score is our report card.

The staffing rule —Senior practitioners only · a named lead from framing to the 90-day check-in

Jurisdictions

Local weight. International standards.

One practice, two directions — Indonesian institutions answering to the world, and international firms answering to Indonesia.

For Indonesian institutions

International standards, without translation loss

Banks, SOEs, and enterprises answering to global partners, correspondent banks, or certification bodies — advised in the ISO, NIST, and SOC 2 language those counterparties expect, by a team that also sits across the table from OJK and BSSN.

ISO 27001:2022NIST CSF 2.0SOC 2PCI DSS v4.0SWIFT CSPCIS v8.1

For international firms entering Indonesia

Local regulatory weight, briefed in English

Regional headquarters and market entrants navigating OJK licensing, UU PDP, PSE registration, and data-residency rules — with working papers in English and Bahasa Indonesia, from a firm regulators already know.

OJK / POJKBank IndonesiaBSSNUU PDPKominfo PSEMAS TRM

Working papers in English and Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta headquarters, Singapore regional office — one engagement lead across both.

FAQ

Common questions

Straight answers. If yours isn't here, ask us directly.

Consulting answers a question; a vCISO owns a program. An engagement here is a fixed-scope project — weeks, not months — that ends in a decision memo with owners and a sequence. If those findings need standing executive ownership afterward, that's the vCISO service: a named leader, a governance cadence, and accountability quarter after quarter. Consulting is frequently how that relationship starts.

The next decision is yours. Make it on evidence.

Nine fixed-scope engagements, senior practitioners only, and a memo that ends in a decision — not a deck. Start by framing the question.