ZENTARA
← All impact studies
Data governance/ Mining and metals (state-owned enterprise)

Data Governance Programme for MIND ID

A 20-week, DAMA-DMBOK-aligned programme that gave MIND ID's group-wide data named owners, shared standards and a metadata foundation for its Data Lake.

MIND IDCompleted engagement
MIND ID
Illustrative imagery

Completed engagement. Source study dated 24 July 2026. The results listed are the programme's delivered outputs; quantitative data-quality metrics after handover are not reported.

Scope
20 weeks
Programme timeline
Delivered
Scope
5 phases
Delivery model
Initiation to closure
Scope
11 areas
DAMA-DMBOK coverage
Governance at the centre
Scope
6 steps
Zentara method
Discovery to roadmap

The challenge

MIND ID's data sits across many entities and systems, from exploration to product marketing, with limited integration, no shared definitions, unclear ownership and reactive management. Without a governance layer, the Data Lake in its IT Master Plan risks becoming a data swamp that no one can trust, trace or act on.

Executive Summary

PT Mining Industry Indonesia (MIND ID), the state-owned mining holding company, manages data across many entities — from exploration to product marketing. Today that data is scattered across systems with limited integration, inconsistent definitions, unclear ownership, and reactive management. These gaps reduce the reliability of insight, weaken decision-making, and limit the organization's ability to meet regulatory and operational standards.

The Data Lake initiative in MIND ID's IT Master Plan must deliver tangible business value. Its success depends on a structured Data Governance framework — supported by a Metadata Development program and a Data Management Roadmap — to prevent the Data Lake from degrading into a “data swamp” and to enable accurate, data-driven decision-making.

Zentara proposes an enterprise Data Governance programme aligned with DAMA-DMBOK best practices. The approach runs a regulatory and best-practice review, holistic data discovery, a maturity and gap assessment, and structured stakeholder engagement to define the target state — then designs a complete operating model covering governance structure, stewardship roles, RACI, policies, standards, and procedures.

Delivered as a 20-week, five-phase programme, the engagement establishes a Data Governance Council, develops enterprise policies, runs capacity-building, and launches early pilot quick wins — such as a business glossary and a metadata registry. On completion, MIND ID gains a robust, scalable framework that strengthens data quality, improves compliance, and unlocks greater business value from enterprise data.

6-Step

ZENTARA METHODOLOGY

11 Areas

DAMA-DMBOK COVERAGE

20 Weeks

PROGRAMME TIMELINE

5 Phases

DELIVERY MODEL

5 Principles

GOVERNANCE FOUNDATION

1 Council

ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT

RACI

CLEAR ACCOUNTABILITY

Pilot

EARLY QUICK WINS

Client Context & The Challenge

Organizational Context

As the state-owned mining holding company, MIND ID oversees a group of entities whose operations span the full value chain — from exploration and processing to commercial activities and product marketing. At that scale, data integrity is not an IT concern alone; it is a strategic asset central to the group's digital transformation and to confident, coordinated decision-making across subsidiaries.

Current Condition

Zentara's reading of the current state identifies five recurring conditions that limit the value MIND ID draws from its data:

  • Fragmentation. Data is scattered across multiple systems with limited integration.
  • No shared standards. There are no consistent data standards, metadata, or shared definitions.
  • Reactive management. Data management practices are reactive and lack a structured roadmap.
  • Unclear ownership. Data ownership and accountability are unclear within business functions.
  • Limited strategic use. Data use for strategic decision-making remains limited.

Why this matters

Without a governance layer, a Data Lake accumulates data faster than it accumulates meaning — and degrades into a “data swamp” that no one trusts. For a state-owned enterprise in a regulated sector, the cost is compounded: weaker compliance evidence, slower decisions, and unrealized value from data already collected. The question is not whether MIND ID has data, but whether it can trust, trace, and act on it.

Project Objectives & Scope of Solution

The programme is organized around four expectations, the ownership needed to execute them, and the three solution components that deliver them.

Project Expectations

  • Enhance operational efficiency. Integrated, high-quality data streamlines business processes across entities — exploration, processing, and commercial activities.
  • Ensure regulatory compliance. Manage data to relevant standards, mitigating the regulatory risks pertinent to a state-owned mining enterprise.
  • Enable data-driven decisions. Provide a credible single source of truth via the Data Lake, empowering management to decide faster and more accurately.
  • Optimize data asset value. Transform raw data into a strategic asset that generates new insight and drives innovation across the corporation.

Execution Ownership

  • Governance Council. An executive-level Data Governance Council provides mandates, approves policies, and ensures subsidiary entities comply with the established framework.
  • Owner & Steward roles. Data Owners (business leadership) and Data Stewards (operational) are explicitly defined to enforce policy, monitor quality, and manage day-to-day metadata.
  • Technology team. IT leads the technical development of the Data Lake and the deployment of the centralized Data Catalog and metadata solutions.
  • Cross-functional integration. Project leads ensure close collaboration between Business, IT, and Compliance to create a practical, adopted governance framework.

2.3 The Solution

Component

What it delivers

Data Governance Framework

A comprehensive policy framework (quality, security, access) with appointed Data Owners and Stewards to resolve data-definition conflicts and quality issues.

Data Management Roadmap

A structured, phased implementation based on business priority, ensuring adequate resource allocation for tools and infrastructure.

Metadata Development

A Centralized Data Catalog that standardizes business definitions and enables end-to-end data lineage (data tracking).

Zentara's Approach — A Six-Step Methodology

Zentara structures the engagement as one continuous capability build, not a one-off project. Six steps move MIND ID from discovering the current landscape, through defining and designing the governance model, to executing and sustaining it.

#

Step

Focus

1

Regulatory & Best-Practice Review

Identify and align with the standards, frameworks, and regulations applicable to MIND ID.

2

Holistic Data Discovery

Collect data-related information across systems, processes, and stakeholders to understand the current landscape.

3

Stakeholder Engagement & Future State

Run interviews and workshops with key stakeholders to define the desired future state and guiding principles.

4

Assessment & Gap Analysis

Evaluate governance maturity, assess existing practices, and identify gaps between current and target states.

5

Operating Model Design

Define the organization, roles, responsibilities, and processes needed for an effective data-governance model.

6

Strategy & Implementation Roadmap

Develop a strategic roadmap of priorities, initiatives, and investment planning to reach target maturity.

How the methodology helps

The six steps group into three arcs, each producing a concrete result:

  • Discovery & Alignment (Steps 1–2). Uncovers the current data landscape and ensures regulatory compliance.
  • Definition & Design (Steps 3–4). Defines ownership, roles, and a clear governance structure.
  • Execution & Roadmap (Steps 5–6). Provides an actionable plan for governance maturity improvement.

The through-line

Data Governance is not a project — it is a capability. Zentara helps MIND ID build it systematically and sustainably, so clear ownership, consistent standards, and trusted enterprise data outlast any single initiative and continue to drive digital transformation.

What is Data Governance

Data Governance is the framework of policies, processes, roles, and responsibilities that ensures data is accurate, consistent, secure, and used responsibly to support business objectives. It defines how data is managed, who is accountable, and what standards apply across its entire lifecycle — from creation through usage, sharing, and retention. Its purpose is to make data trusted, well-managed, and aligned with organizational goals, enabling better decision-making, efficiency, and risk management.

Key Principles

  • Accountability. Clear ownership and stewardship of data assets.
  • Quality. Data that is accurate, complete, and reliable.
  • Security. Protection from unauthorized access and misuse.
  • Compliance. Meeting legal, regulatory, and ethical standards.
  • Consistency. Standardized definitions, policies, and metadata across systems.

Reference Frameworks

Several established frameworks guide enterprise data governance. Zentara anchors the MIND ID programme on DAMA-DMBOK, drawing on the others where they add value.

Framework

Developed By

Focus Area

Best For

DAMA-DMBOK

DAMA International

Comprehensive governance & management

General / enterprise use

DCAM

EDM Council

Capability maturity

Financial & regulated sectors

COBIT

ISACA

IT governance integration

Compliance-driven organizations

CDMC

EDM Council

Cloud data governance

Cloud-first enterprises

ISO 38505

ISO

International governance principles

Global standardization

DMM

CMMI Institute

Maturity development

Capability development

Gartner

Gartner

Practical / federated governance

Large organizations

DGUP

IBM

Step-by-step implementation

Structured rollout programs

Why DAMA-DMBOK

DAMA-DMBOK offers a comprehensive, structured foundation that helps MIND ID establish clear principles, roles, and processes for data governance from the very beginning — ensuring consistency across all entities.

The DAMA-DMBOK Framework

DAMA-DMBOK (Data Management Body of Knowledge) is a global standard framework by DAMA International that provides comprehensive guidance for managing data as a strategic asset. It defines the principles, functions, and best practices of data management, and positions Data Governance as the core discipline that ensures consistency, quality, and accountability across all data-related activities.

Objectives for MIND ID

  • Best-practice reference for enterprise data management.
  • Established governance, policies, and accountability for data management.
  • Improved data quality, security, and business value of information assets.

The 11 Functional Areas — Structure & Key Activities

Data Governance sits at the center of eleven functional areas. Each area carries a focus, key activities, and expected outcomes that shape the MIND ID roadmap.

Functional Area

Key Activities and Expected Outcomes

Data Governance
Framework, policies, and accountability for managing data.

Key : Define structure & roles (Council, Steward, Owner), Develop policies & approval mechanisms
Outcome : Data Governance Framework

Governance Charter & RACI Matrix

Data Architecture
Blueprint for how data is structured and integrated.

Key : Define enterprise data model

Align architecture with business & IT
Outcome : Enterprise Data Architecture Blueprint

Data Modeling & Design
Standardizes data definitions and relationships.

Key : Create conceptual, logical & physical models. Define naming conventions
Outcome : Standardized Data Models

Data Dictionary

Data Storage & Operations
Reliable, secure, efficient storage and operations.

Key : Define storage & lifecycle policies

Implement backup and recovery
Outcome : Reliable Storage & Recovery Procedures

Data Security
Protects data from unauthorized access and misuse.

Key : Establish access-control policies

Classify sensitive data & monitor
Outcome : Data Protection Policy

Compliance Reports

Data Integration & Interoperability
How data flows and connects between systems.

Key : Define exchange standards (API, ETL). Maintain lineage & synchronization.

Outcome : Unified Data Integration Framework

Document & Content Management
Manages unstructured and semi-structured content.

Key : Define metadata for documents

Implement content classification
Outcome : Document Repository with Metadata

Reference & Master Data
Core business data for consistency and accuracy.

Key : Define golden records

Establish MD governance & stewardship
Outcome : Centralized Master Data Repository

Data Warehousing & BI
Analytics and reporting on trusted data.

Key : Define BI governance processes

Ensure lineage from source to dashboard
Outcome : Trusted Reports & Dashboards

Metadata
Context and meaning for data assets.

Key : Develop enterprise metadata catalog. Define ownership, lineage & usage.

Outcome : Centralized Metadata Repository

Data Quality
Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of data.

Key : Define quality dimensions & KPIs

Establish monitoring & remediation

Outcome : Data Quality Dashboard & Reports

Solution Methodology, Scope & Timeline

The programme runs across five phases over twenty weeks. Each phase carries defined activities and concrete deliverables, sequenced so that governance design is validated before implementation and sustained after handover.

Phase

Weeks

Key Activities

Deliverables

Initiation & Preparation

W1

  • Kick-off & alignment with MIND ID strategic plan
  • Establish governance (PMO, DG Office, stakeholders)
  • Define objectives, success criteria & comms plan
  • Project Charter & Kick-off Deck
  • Governance Structure
  • Communication Plan

Assessment & Analysis

W2–W3

  • Review policies, procedures & data assets
  • Maturity & gap assessment (people, process, tech)
  • Identify data domains & stakeholders
  • Preliminary classification & DG roadmap
  • Current State & Gap Analysis Report
  • Data Domain Mapping
    Preliminary DG Roadmap

Design & Planning

W4–W7

  • Design DG Framework (org, process, standards)
  • Define policies, principles & standards
  • Define RACI & role responsibilities
  • Develop enablement; run training & validation
  • DG Framework Document
    DG Policy & Standards
    Role Definition & RACI Matrix
    Training & Awareness Materials

Implementation & Enablement

W8–W12

  • Establish DG Council & working committees
  • Launch framework & pilot use case (catalog / DQ)
  • Implement workflows & stewardship tracking
  • Progress review, change mgmt & KPI monitoring
  • DG Council Charter
    Pilot Implementation Report
    DG Workflow Templates
    Change Management Summary

Evaluation & Closure

W13–W20

  • Evaluation & post-implementation review
  • Finalize documentation & handover to DG Office
  • Define sustainability plan & future roadmap
  • Present final report to steering committee
  • Post-Implementation Review (PIR)
    Handover Package
    Sustainability Roadmap
    Final Presentation Deck

Consolidated Deliverables

Across the programme, MIND ID receives a complete, auditable governance package — from assessment through sustainment:

  • Maturity & gap assessment reports establishing the baseline and target state.
  • Enterprise data policies and standards covering quality, security, access, and metadata.
  • Governance structures — Data Governance Council charter, Owner/Steward roles, and a RACI matrix.
  • Workflow templates for stewardship, change management, and data-quality monitoring.
  • Pilot quick wins — a business glossary and a metadata registry that demonstrate early value.
  • Training and awareness materials to embed data-driven practices across the workforce.
  • A sustainability roadmap to carry the governance model forward after handover.

Target Outcomes & Value

The programme moves MIND ID from today's fragmented, reactive state to a governed, accountable, and trusted data environment.

Current Condition (As-Is)

Target Condition

Data scattered with limited integration; no shared standards

Defined data accountability and responsibility across entities

Unclear ownership and accountability

Knowledge and common understanding of data assets

Reactive management; data not consistently traceable

Trust and confidence in traceable data

Value from data largely unrealized

Improved data ROI and reduced data debt

Limited strategic and ethical data use

Support for ethical use of data in a data-driven culture

On completion, MIND ID gains a robust, scalable Data Governance capability that strengthens data quality, enhances operational efficiency, improves regulatory compliance, and unlocks greater business value from enterprise data — positioning the group to operate with higher confidence in its data and supporting its broader digital transformation.

Zentara Technologies is a cybersecurity and enterprise technology company headquartered in Jakarta, with a regional office in Singapore. Zentara is not a reseller or vendor, but a strategic technology architect for high-stakes institutions and mission-critical enterprises — designing and building solutions that are precise, integrated, and built to endure.

Zentara's operations are certified to ISO 27001 (Information Security Management System) and ISO 42001 (Artificial Intelligence Management System). Its capabilities span cybersecurity, cyber intelligence, cyber defense, and enterprise solutions — including data governance, GRC, and system integration — aligned with local regulators (OJK, BSSN) and international frameworks (NIST, DAMA-DMBOK, PCI DSS).

Outcome & next steps

Outcome & next steps

Delivered over 20 weeks and five phases: a Data Governance Council charter, defined Data Owner and Data Steward roles and a RACI matrix; enterprise policies and standards for data quality, security, access and metadata; workflow templates for stewardship, change management and data-quality monitoring; pilot quick wins in the form of a business glossary and a metadata registry; training and awareness materials; and a sustainability roadmap handed over to the Data Governance Office.

Related capabilities